Large Tax Increases Looming for Investment Gains

The Capital Gain Tax Rate will increase in 2011 from 15% to 20% per the sunset provisions in the current law.  On top of the 5% increase, starting in 2013 a new Medicare Contribution Tax, IRC § 1411, will subject the “net investment income” of individuals, estates and trusts to an additional 3.8% tax to the extent the taxpayer’s “modified adjusted gross income” (MAGI) exceeds threshold amounts. “Net investment income” includes capital gains from sales on investment properties and rentals (property held in a passive activity). Thus, it will apply to most 1031 properties held by individuals, or by partnerships and S corporation. It will not apply to properties used in an active trade or business or by a C corporation. The income thresholds are $250,000 for married couples and $200,000 for other taxpayers.

The definition of net investment income applies the tax to MAGI above the threshold levels “to the extent taken into account in computing taxable income.”  Thus, gain deferred under Section 1031 should not be subject to the tax, although regulations have yet to be issued.

Example A:

A single taxpayer has MAJI of $150,000, including $100,000 of gain from a rental home. The tax does not apply because the MAJI is less than $200K.

Example B:

A single taxpayer has MAJI of $250,000, including $100,000 of gain from a rental home.  The tax applies to $50,000 of the gain (the net investment income in excess of MAJI).

Example C:

A single taxpayer has MAJI of $300,000, including $100,000 of gain from a rental home.  The tax applies to the full $100,000 of gain.



Posted in Tax Rate Increases | Leave a comment

Related Party Exchange Disallowed

11th Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Ocmulgee Fields, Inc. 132 T.C. 105 (2009).
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the decision in Ocmulgee Fields, Inc. which involved the acquisition of replacement property from a related party.

The Tax Court concluded the exchange was disallowed based on the provisions of Section 1031(f)(4), that the transaction, or series of transactions, were structured solely to avoid the purposes of the related party rules under Section 1031(f).

Ocmulgee, in its appeal, argued the Tax Court’s factual findings were erroneous and that neither the Taxpayer nor the related party intended to subvert the related party rules, and provided a list of explanations for why the exchange was structured as it was.

The Circuit Court found Ocmulgees’ explanations non-persuasive and concluded the Tax Court did not err in its holding.

Posted in Related Party Exchanges | Leave a comment

Welcome to our Blog!

Welcome to Olympic Exchange Accommodator’s Blog.

We hope you will feel free to post comments and questions as you see fit! For our first blog, we wanted to discuss the new safe harbor established by the IRS for people whose 1031 facilitator filed a bankruptcy and they were unable to complete their exchange. In most cases, the taxpayers’ proceeds from their relinquished property have been tied up in the bankruptcy, preventing them from completing their exchange. To make matters even worse, the IRS had taken the position that the capital gains tax was still due in the year during which the relinquished property closed. This subjected taxpayers to interest and penalties, because they were unable to pay the tax since the money was tied up in the facilitator’s bankruptcy proceedings.

In March, the IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2010-14. It provides that when a taxpayer is unable to complete an exchange because the facilitator was in bankruptcy, gain is deferred until the tax year net liability relief exceeds the taxpayers’ basis and/or payments attributable to relinquished property are received within the bankruptcy.

For more information, please click on the following link:

http://olympic1031.com/blog/?page_id=32

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment